| Sleep |
[Jul. 11th, 2009|02:32 pm] |
I've been up every night this week with Brett and / or Eliot. Getting out of bed wakes both baby and reflux so then it takes me a long time to get back to sleep but I am sleeping very soundly when I do. Sleep deprivation is torture but nightmares are worse. Last night I had the worst nightmare of my life.
We were at a family fun day. The boys all ran off ahead (in the dream I wasn't pregnant and Eliot was a few years older) and as I climbed up a hill after them I got bailed up by a big black dog, a Labrador cross. He didn't bite me but knocked me over and pinned me down. I called to a man and a boy nearby to get him off but they laughed and said he didn't belong to them. Then the owner came and called the dog - Prince - away. The owner wasn't at all apologetic the dog had knocked me down and said it was my fault for having food in my pockets.
I began to look around for the boys because I hadn't seen them for a while. There was a talent contest going on as I ran past a small stage and a woman was singing a familiar song in an unfamiliar way. I think it might have been Gloria Gaynor's I Will Survive. I ran along a muddy track towards a bridge over a creek. There were some teenage boys playing in the creek. I knew Aidan was wearing a red jumper but I couldn't see a red jumper anywhere. Then I noticed Brett lying on the bank of the creek. His legs were up on the grass. He was taller than he he is now, still skinny, aged about 14 and wearing a blue jumper, blue cap and grey cargo pants. His head was half under the water, his skin pale and his eyes open. It's an image I don't think I will ever forget. I knew instantly that he was dead. I screamed out 'no' and jumped a fence to run down to the water. As I grabbed his ankles to pull him out I looked up at one of the teenage boys who smirked at me and even though there were no marks on him, I knew they had killed him.
Then I woke up. I lay there in shock for a bit. Got up to check on Brett (who was sleeping) then got back in bed and sobbed and sobbed. I've had dreams where I've been stabbed, drowned and buried alive. I've had dreams where the others have run out in front of cars or fallen in dark water but I've always woken up at the moment of searching. This is the first time I've dreamed of finding one of them dead. I've been disoriented and teary all day and I think it will be very late before I let myself fall asleep tonight.
I finished reading the Tawny Man trilogy yesterday (may have something to do with it but I can't see any obvious connection) and I've got no work on so now I can't even lose myself in a book or typing. Am going to play SimCity instead. |
|
|
| Is Plantinga’s epistemology “radically relativistic”? |
[Jul. 10th, 2009|03:02 pm] |
In a previous post, I briefly presented Alvin Plantinga’s “Reformed epistemologist” thesis that theistic (and Christian) belief may possess warrant in a “properly basic” way (i.e., in such a way that the proposition believed does not gain warrant from having its basis in propositional evidence). There I focused on Plantinga’s response to atheist Michael Martin’s objection that Plantinga’s brand of epistemological foundationalism “puts any belief beyond rational appraisal once it is declared basic” and concluded that Martin’s objection fails. I would now like to consider Plantinga’s response to a second objection, also raised by Martin and related to the first objection.
( Martin vs. Plantinga—the final showdown )
Martin’s second objection, then, fails—just like the first. Although it is “at least interesting,” it “suffers from the annoying defect of having a false premise” (ibid., p. 349). Hence, Plantinga’s Reformed epistemology (and his extended Calvin/Aquinas model of warranted Christian belief) is not “radically relativistic.”
On the contrary, Plantinga’s thought requires that we ourselves rethink the nature of interfaith dialogue (and the way we conceive of the nature of the convert_me challenge). I can claim that my Christian belief is true, and this claim may have warrant, without my needing to argue that Christianity is true or that my belief has warrant. Hence, if a person of, say, Muslim faith wishes to challenge my belief, it will not follow that my mere inability to present an argument for my belief in and of itself permits the Muslim to assert that I must not possess warrant for that belief; other reasons must be adduced. Perhaps the following inductive argument: “I have been able to demonstrate that most people I’ve met who lack arguments for their belief also lack warrant for their belief; you do not have arguments for your belief; ergo, your belief is probably unwarranted.” But it seems that the only really persuasive arguments against the warrant of my belief will be ones that target the truth of my belief. If so, it follows that the burden of proof is initially on the one who denies that my belief has warrant, and not on me to show that it has warrant. But, in keeping with the argument of my former post, once an objection has been leveled against the truth of my belief, then my interlocutor will have shifted the burden of proof to me. |
|
|
| Can we all agree on this one? |
[Jul. 10th, 2009|03:23 pm] |
It is my belief that anybody who accepts Breatharianism is an idiot, and that all those who died trying this deserve Darwin Awards
EDIT:
Oh, and also, this is one of those things that prove I shouldn't believe someone just because they say it. It is very reasonable for me to disbelieve such outrageous claims. Other, equally outrageous claims, can likewise be disbelieved even if individuals claim it to be true. |
|
|
| Graduate Programs |
[Jul. 10th, 2009|02:01 pm] |
Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with Somatic Psychology or if anyone was currently pursuing a graduate degree in this field. Could anyone recommend any programs or universities? I split my time between Europe and the States, and ideally I was looking for a program in Europe but I'm open to any suggestions. So far, State-side I have been looking at the ever seductive California Institute of Integral Studies, JFK University, and the Santa Barbara Graduate Institute. More particularly I am interested in Somatic/Body Dynamic Psychology with an emphasis on Holistic Studies/Herbalism and women as healers.
I thank you for any information you would share. |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Jul. 10th, 2009|12:27 pm] |
"the word was God and the word was with God"
perhaps
God is all God is turns to be word perhaps eventually the word was thus originally God "the word was God"
the word stays with God God gives or release the word through speach or similar "the word was with God"
God perhaps taking part of his or His experience and being and making it word then releasing word
perhaps also
God is word then changes to not be word any longer "the word was God"
the word God is is with God God perhaps releases the word "the word was with God"
God is made up of word God then releases word
statement does not define God is statement also seemingly does not allow God to maintain word the statement in general seems to consist of being and releasing being perhaps beneficial for cleaning however does not seem very beneficial otherwise
"the word is God and the word is with God" "the word is of God and the word is with God" "God is word and the word is with God" "God is of word and the word is with God"
|
|
|
| Sunland. |
[Jul. 10th, 2009|08:27 am] |
i know that i am probably preaching to the choir about this, but i would just like to raise my voice that this "Sunland" utopia island fantastical anarchist dreamworld love party is utter and complete nonsense. there are many reasons why it will promptly fail if it ever actually gets off the ground, which is unlikely. but i want to focus on just one. the idea for this utopia rests on the notion that the interested party will negotiate and essentially ask for an island from the British government or whoever.
HAVE YOU EVER BEEN ASKED FOR SOMETHING?
DID YOU FEEL THAT THAT PERSON KINDA SORTA OWED YOU SOMETHING AFTERWARD?
HAVE YOU EVER ASKED SOMEONE FOR SOMETHING?
DID YOU FEEL LIKE YOU HAD AN IMPLICIT (OR EXPLICIT) OBLIGATION TO THAT PERSON AFTERWARD?
this is called human interaction and it establishes the continuation of an uneven give/recieve relationship. you are subjugating yourself from the very start and you will keep that position for as long as you are dealing with that person. SO...
it is not a good idea! to ASK for anything! this is my advice as a human being with BASIC EXPERIENCE IN HUMAN INTERACTION.
thats all. |
|
|
| President Obama Threatens to Veto Intelligence Bill |
[Jul. 10th, 2009|01:28 am] |
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/07/president-obama-threatens-to-veto-intelligence-bill.html
President Obama threatened to veto the Intelligence Authorization Act Wednesday, asserting that Congress was unconstitutionally pursuing information about executive branch deliberations.
It was the third veto threat the president had issued since being elected last November. The first, made before he was sworn in, was to those lawmakers who wanted to block release of the second $350 billion in TARP funds to bail out financial institutions.
Currently, the White House is required to report on certain covert actions to the "Gang of Eight" - the Speaker of the House, the House Minority Leader, the Senate Democratic and Republican Leaders, and the top Democrat and top Republican in both the House and Senate Intelligence Committees.
The legislation being debated would amend the National Security Act of 1947 in ways, the Obama administration asserted, "that would raise significant executive privilege concerns" by requiring the disclosure to the Gang of Eight "internal Executive branch legal advice and deliberations. Administrations of both political parties have long recognized the importance of protecting the confidentiality of the Executive Branch's legal advice and deliberations."
The new legislative language would run "afoul of tradition by restricting an important established means by which the President protects the most sensitive intelligence activities that are carried out in the Nation's vital national security interests," said the statement, issued by the Office of Management and Budget. "If the final bill presented to the President contains this provision, the President's senior advisors would recommend a veto."
I would, of course, point out that Congress pursuing information =/= US getting said information. But still. |
|
|
| Honduras |
[Jul. 10th, 2009|12:21 pm] |
Excuse me in advance, if the attempt of this poetry translation from Russian into English lost some necessary poetical expression. We all should to help someway to the fighting Honduras people.
Here again the military uniformed gorillas. They grabbed you by the throat, O Honduras! Under the tropical sun, for many centuries Your people carry ordeal And yet...How long it to bear? Swollen-headed grandee-demons Long ago took away But greedy gringo came… That’s scarcely better. For freedom, for truth Arise Honduras! Sweep off that bloody pack With your own horny hand!
Dmitriy Kremnev.
Гондурас
Вот снова гориллы в военных мундирах Схватили за горло тебя, Гондурас Под солнцем тропическим многие веки Народ твой мытарствует Доколе ж терпеть? Чванливые демоны-гранды Убрались Не лучше их алчные гринго пришли… Восстань Гондурас За свободу, за правду! Мозолистой дланью Всю свору смети!
Дмитрий Кремнёв. |
|
|
| Boganville |
[Jul. 10th, 2009|12:54 pm] |
I've started packing my hospital bags. So far in my labour bag I have a packet of maternity pads and in my maternity ward bag I have a roll of toilet tissue - I think that pretty much sums up the experience and priorities of childbirth! Even that limited amount is probably more than most bogans turn up with.
From Wikipeadia (also see: http://www.bogan.com.au/definition/index.php)
The term bogan (pronounced /ˈboʊɡən/, rhyming with slogan) is Australian and New Zealand English slang, usually pejorative or self-deprecating, for a person who is, or is perceived to be, of a lower-class background. According to the stereotype, the speech and mannerisms of "bogans" indicate poor education, cheap clothing and uncultured upbringing. 'Bogans' usually reside in economically disadvantaged suburbs (often outer metropolitan) or rural areas. The term is a regional equivalent to the English slang terms chav or pikey, Scottish ned, Irish scanger or spide, Dutch tokkie, and the North American white trash, redneck, or hillbilly.
---
I know I live in Boganville but I do a very good job of pretending I don't unless I'm confronted with obvious signs which are suprisingly rare unless I venture to well known bogan hangouts like the main street and the hospital. Unfortunately, even with all the new development, the area seems to be getting worse, not better. This morning there was a shopping trolley in our road and while driving the boys to school I saw a girl, aged about 12, walking along the road towards the corner shop wearing mismatched pyjamas - singlet and shorts in 11 degrees! - fluffy slippers (obviously an amateur otherwise she would have been wearing ugg boots) and a pair of black fingerless gloves.
She was probably pregnant.
And I will probably find myself sharing a maternity ward room with her 15yo sister. In which case I should probably consider putting a padlock on my hospital bag... |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Jul. 9th, 2009|04:34 pm] |
Hey everyone! I need some advice. I was accepted to the Chicago School of Professional Psychology for the Masters in Clinical Psychology with an emphasis on Applied Behavior Analysis. I have been working as an ABA/Behavior therapist for a school district for 4 years and I've recently been employed by a well known private ABA organization. It's imperative that I become BCBA certified. There are many career opportunities in the private clinics and organizations that require a Masters and BCBA certification. The reason why this program appeals to me is because the BCBA coursework and supervision are embedded in this Masters program. Here's my dilemma...I keep hearing less than stellar comments about the Chicago School. I know it's overpriced and I know the PsyD's raise eyebrows due to the exorbitant price. Is it a horrible idea to attend a Masters program at this school? Please, I'd really appreciate any comments, thoughts, anecdotes, ANYTHING regarding the Masters programs at The Chicago School.
Thanks! |
|
|
| Dave is sentenced. |
[Jul. 9th, 2009|05:58 pm] |
| [ | music |
| | Bob Dylan, "Chimes of Freedom" | ] |
 Friends, right now there is no smile on my face, & I'm feeling down & in a grim mood. Today, a bit before Two P.M., Dave Mahoney was sentenced to 90 days by Ramsey County Judge Paulette Flynn in Saint Paul. This was the result of his plea bargain, which I've spoken of in this community previously. I recall that that post was on One June,'09.
I truly hate it when the Man's machine gets one of us in its steely grip. Dave, in my book, is a hero, as were all who were in the black bloc on the Marion Street Bridge during the R.N.C.
Below is a link to the Twin Cities Indymedia article by Haloka. He's done a fine job of reporting & I don't have much to add. I'm in too much of a grim mood to say more, eh. Having to sit on a hardwood bench & watch the charade made me gnash my teeth.
http://twincities.indymedia.org/2009/jul/mahoney-sentenced-90-days-will-likely-serve-56
Free All Political Prisoners!
Billy Kropotkin |
|
|
| Depression and Neurotransmitters |
[Jul. 9th, 2009|02:34 pm] |
I am looking for articles/research on a specific type of depression. I'm not sure if it has a separate title (I haven't started my psych schooling quite yet, forgive me!).
Whereas bi-polar patients experience extreme highs and lows, I'm curious about the particular pathology that manifests primarily through numbness and detachment. These patients are basically "unable to feel" and generally not affected by positive OR negative stimuli. There can be a lack of physical or sexual arousal, and very few peaks and valleys of experience. And while often functional (though distant and detached) in daily life, they do not respond appropriately to emotional cues.
Any of the following would be helpful:
*Articles describing this kind of depressive state *Info on the specific neurotransmitter imbalances involved *Current therapy and treatment options
Thanks so much! |
|
|
| Yes, gods do have a reality |
[Jul. 9th, 2009|10:39 am] |
This is just something I wrote for school. Wondered how anarchists would respond to it...
_________________________
If you grow up in a time, in a place, with a tribe, they will show you how to live based on what has been passed down from generations upon generations, aeons upon aeons, of tried-and-true methods of living. They will pass them down to you in the form of stories. Those stories will probably involve gods. That is where they become very real to the peole who believe in them.
Those gods died a long time ago. Today the gods have been reduced to things you buy in books and boxes, kits and trinkets. They teach you virtually nothing. They have things they want you to do that are nothing more than superstitions that have virtually no real merit, nor change in any way of your daily life. And that's due to the advancement and invasion of civilization. When the people of one land invaded another, they brought their gods with them. Those gods taught them how to live in that land from which they came. Although chances are, because they're invading, they need more land. So those gods taught them poorly. Thus they're transferring bad gods onto good people. And they usually always insist on imposing their gods. But to the invaded, the gods teach ways that make no sense whatsoever. Why would a desert god's teachings have any bearings on the ice-dwelling peoples of the north? It is for this reason that, for a world where everyone now lives in apartments and condos, shops for food rather than growing it, and shapes their entire world on how they earn and spend money, none of us understand what a god actually is. We pick our gods eeny meeny miney moe out of vending machines and give them no real special place in our lives. They teach us nothing. We make them a cute ritual that has no bearing on our lives. We still earn, spend, and sit in our condo watching TV. To the people growing up, gods were not consciously chosen. Choice had nothing to do with it. It was simply the language. It was simply the method of communication. It was the air they breathed. They weren't really trying to explain how everything happened, they were simply explaining what was happening. The why wasn't really a concern. If you asked them what story they created, or what religion they had, they'd stare at you with absurd faces. What the devil are you talking about? That is the same response as you'd get if someone asked you the same. Yet your story of how things came to be this way is historical. Believe it or not, your gods are the media, pure and simple. And your media tells stories to preserve your life, but are absurd to the other people. The point is, gods that are pushed onto others are the bad gods who taught their people poorly and ways of life that do not work. Notice, therefore, how they insist their ways are superior. The people, and the gods, who have to insist constantly that their ways are the best, are usually the self-conscious ones who know that they are not. And that is where we stand. Our gods are very real, in a way we don't actually expect them to be. They are the language we use to propagandize. They can be the truths that get us through a sustainable reality. But today, in our world, they are the lies we tell ourselves so that we can continue to live a way that we know is killing everything. And that is why it is considered blasphemy to live sustainably. |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Jul. 9th, 2009|12:45 pm] |
The other day I was leafing through some NT texts. I came across a minor inconsistency.
Was Barabbas a robber or a murderer? One gospel indicates one thing, another indicates something else.
Sure, he coulda been both. But I'm pondering as to the views of those here who are "in the know".
Also: Romans I 18-20:
"The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse." -NIV version
I'm gonna go right ahead and question that. I am not trying to make an excuse, but I am trying to explain my current disagreement with that section. God is not made plain to me; if God were made plain to me, and I had a good reason to suspect God existed, I would believe God existed; as it currently stands, I do not have plain reason to believe in God--certainly not in his eternal power and divine nature. Perhaps my eyes cannot see for I have dirty glasses on infront of my eyes. Perhaps one of you can help clear away the soot.
Might I also ask: why has God's wrath been so incredibly imperceptable these past few thousand years?
~B |
|
|
| Flight of the Honeybees |
[Jul. 9th, 2009|10:15 am] |
there's some sort of ad in the beginning and the bee goodness starts at 35sec.
the apiarist who helped out in this video is Norman Gary who is in the Guinness Book of World Records for holding 109 bees in his mouth.
no word on how this woman managed to keep the bees out of her bonnet so to speak (I'm pretty sure it's a wig, thats ALOT of hair!) |
|
|
| The Fed and Peak Oil - A Gentle Look |
[Jul. 9th, 2009|07:12 am] |
The Fed and peak oil ``Laurel Graefe, a senior economic researcher working for the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta has written an excellent overview of peak oil, “The Peak Oil Debate”. I consider this a must-read piece, as much for armchair oil experts as beginners, and as much for who published this as what it contains. This should be very high on your list of “brother-in-law” documents, the ones you can safely recommend to co-workers, neighbors, or, well, your brother in law.''
http://www.frbatlanta.org/filelegacydocs/er0902_graefe.pdf |
|
|
| navigation |
| [ |
viewing |
| |
most recent entries |
] |
| [ |
go |
| |
earlier |
] |
| |
|
|